![]() For instance, poster sessions give speakers more time to explain their research findings in-depth in comparison to conventional presentations. Maugh (1974) wrote that poster sessions are in many respects “a better way” of communication in contrast to reading and presenting full text papers at conferences. First attempts to summarize and assess the influence of posters were undertaken in the mid 1970s. Investigations on the effects and benefits of scholarly posters have existed for many decades now. Normally, these information are enriched with pictures and other visually stimulating elements to attract the attention of conference attendees. ![]() Like journal abstracts, each poster merely gives information on the purpose of the study carried out by the researcher, a description of the used tools and procedures, a major conclusion as well as implications for research ( Sexton 1984). The average poster consists of four sections, namely, introduction, method, results and discussion which shows similarities to the structures of journal abstracts and scientific experiments ( Shalom 1993 Rowe 2017b). Although posters are primarily a visual medium, they do require communication skills to provide exceeding information on the poster to outsiders ( Rowe and Ilic, 2008). Poster exhibitions are also an effective form of the exchange of concepts, views and opinions at conferences ( Schmidmaier 1981). In addition, poster presentations can be seen as a method of assessment which may help students and researchers to improve their practices and techniques ( Bracher 1998). ![]() In contrast to reading research articles, the purpose of poster sessions is to attract and connect with students, colleagues and professionals on a specific research topic or special field of interest through a poster ( Sexton 1984 Moneyham et al., 1996). Usually, academic posters are a visual instrument to illustrate research ideas in a poster session at an academic conference ( McCann et al., 1994). To do this, it is necessary to distinguish what a scientific poster represents in comparison to other mediums of scholarly communication. Hence, this study analyzes whether or not academic posters are cited. It is remarkable that another traditional means of scholarly communication, the academic poster, barely gets any attention when it comes to scientometric analysis ( Rowe 2017a). Recently, the research about the impact of research software and research data has seen some growth. The output that is analyzed in scientometric analysis oftentimes consists of conventional publication types like academic articles, monographs or papers in conference proceedings. A limitation in this study however is that the impact of academic posters was not measured empirical but rather descriptive. Citations could only be found for 1% of the posters in our dataset. Our data-driven analysis reveals that posters are rarely cited. Primarily, we want to know to what extent scientific posters are being cited and thereby which impact posters potentially have on the scholarly landscape and especially on academic publications. Citation data was taken from DataCite, Crossref and Dimensions. The study takes into account the years 2016–2020 according to the dates of publication on the platforms. ![]() We present a small case study on citations of conference posters using poster collections from both Figshare and Zenodo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |